The challenge of the Quran is the most important reason for the miracle of the Holy Quran. During the 23 years of the gradual revelation of the Quran, the deniers have been invited to imitate the Quran in many verses in different ways. Tafsir scholars, considering the inconsistency of the logical course of the verses of the challenge with the order of revelation of the surahs, have mentioned various aspects in justifying it, in this article, the opinions of two contemporary Shiite scholars, Allameh Tabatabai and Ayatollah Fazel Lankarani, have been examined on the issue of the challenge with a comparative approach. is The main question of the research is that, through the comparative study between the opinion of Allameh Tabatabai and Ayatollah Fazel Lankarani, how are the verses of Tadhi analyzed? The results of the research indicate that Allameh Tabatabai, due to the difference in the purposes of each of the verses of challenge, and Ayatollah Fadel, by insisting on the word "Muftriat" in Surah Hud, add challenges between the verses. However, according to the authors, the numerous words in the verses of the challenge refer to the same truth from different perspectives. Basically, in the verses of the challenge, except for the verse of Surah Hud, we are faced with a difference in interpretation, not a difference in value.