Comparative Studies of Quran

Comparative Studies of Quran

A Comparative Evaluation of the Narrative Types Attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās Regarding the Virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) (With an Emphasis on the Exegetical Narrations from Both Sunni and Shiʿi Traditions)

Document Type : Original

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Qur'anic and Hadith Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Qur'anic and Hadith Sciences, Eghlid Higher Education Center, Eghlid, Iran.
Abstract
Detailed Abstract
Research Objective: The objective of this study is to establish the position of the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them), especially Imam ʿAlī (peace be upon him), within the exegetical narrations transmitted from Ibn ʿAbbās. The significance of this topic stems from the fact that numerous narrations in various fields of Qur’anic exegesis have been attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās in both Sunni and Shiʿi sources. According to Islamic tradition, Ibn ʿAbbās is regarded as the foremost exegete after ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib. Therefore, the perspective of Ibn ʿAbbās—renowned as one of the most eminent Qur’anic exegetes and a translator of the Qur’an—toward the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) holds particular importance.
Research Methodology: This research adopts descriptive and library methods accompanied by data analysis. The statistical corpus includes classical, medieval, and later narrative Qur’anic exegetes from both Sunni and Shiʿi traditions, selected based on the frequency and importance of their reported exegetical narrations. Narrations attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās regarding the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt were extracted and comparatively evaluated within the context of the relevant verses in these Qur’anic exegetes. A typological categorization of these narrations was then conducted. Additionally, the study examines possible textual variations or transformations between the Sunni and Shiʿi versions of the narrations.
Findings: The findings indicate a divergence in how Sunni and Shiʿi Qur’anic exegetes transmit narrations on the virtues attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās. Among Shiʿi exegetes, figures such as Furāt al-Kūfī, al-Ḥuwayzī, and al-Baḥrānī actively report narrations supporting the Ahl al-Bayt and affirming their divine guardianship [Wilāyah]. In contrast, other exegetes such as Shaykh al-Ṭūsī and al-Ṭabrisī generally refrain from highlighting these virtues, not due to skepticism about Ibn ʿAbbās himself, but due to their broader conciliatory approach aimed at promoting inter-sectarian unity and avoiding discord. Among early Shiʿi Qur’anic exegetes, the number of narrations in al-Tafsīr ʿAyyāshī is limited, possibly because he prioritized jurisprudential issues and ruling verses [Āyāt al-aḥkām] over the reporting of virtues.
Among Sunni Qur’anic exegetes, one group avoids reporting such narrations altogether, while another shows greater fairness and includes more of them. Tafsīr works like those of Muqātil ibn Sulaymān, ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī, and al-Ṭabarī’s Jāmiʿ al-Bayān fall into the former category. Meanwhile, Tafsīr al-Kashf and Tafsīr al-Bayān by al-Thaʿlabī belong to the latter, indicating that his approach was more neutral and focused on transmitting exegetical narrations regardless of verifying their authenticity or theological implications.
Conclusion: This study concludes that the largest number of narrations concerning the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās in Sunni narrative exegetical works appear in al-Durr al-Manthūr and the Shiʿi Tafsīr of Furāt al-Kūfī. Notably, the chain of transmission in all these narrations generally follows the route: al-Kalbī from Abū Ṣāliḥ from Ibn ʿAbbās. Undoubtedly, the quantity of such narrations in various Qur’anic exegeses is influenced by the theological orientation and exegetical tendencies of the Qur’anic exegetes. For instance, al-ʿAyyāshī focused on jurisprudential narrations, al-Ṭabarī’s omission was rooted in doctrinal bias, and Shaykh al-Ṭūsī and al-Ṭabrisī limited their inclusion of such narrations due to their ecumenical outlook. On the other hand, the Qur’anic exegeses like those of Furāt al-Kūfī (due to theological motives), and of al-Thaʿlabī and al-Suyūṭī (due to their more impartial reporting), offer a broader representation of these narrations.
Ultimately, while the number of narrations attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās concerning the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt varies across Qur’anic exegeses depending on the exegetical approach, the absence or limitation of such narrations does not negate their existence, nor does it undermine Ibn ʿAbbās’s established position. Beyond mere statistics, Ibn ʿAbbās—recognized as one of the most prominent exegetes among the Companions and the interpreter of the Qur’an—clearly understood and conveyed that the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) were the referents, intended meaning, and true interpretation of numerous Qur'anic verses.
Keywords

Subjects


The Holy Quran
Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Abdul Hamid ibn Hibatullah (1378 SH): "Sharh Nahj al-Balagha", Beirut: Dar Iḥya' al-Kutub al-Arabiyyah.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Ahmad ibn Ali (1404 AH): "Tahdhib al-Tahdhib", Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1st ed.
Ibn Kholakan, Ahmad ibn Muhammad (1970 AD): "Wafiyat al-A'yan wa Anba' Abna' al-Zaman", Beirut: Dar al-Thaqafah.
Ibn Sa'd, Muhammad (n.d.):" Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra", Beirut: Dar Sader.
Alousi, Mahmoud (1415 AH): "Ruh al-Ma'ani fi Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim wa al-Sab' al-Mathani", Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1st ed.
Bahrani, Seyyed Hashim (1416 AH): "Al-Burhan fi Tafsir al-Quran", Tehran: Bonyad Ba'ithat, 1st ed.
Tha'labi Nishaburi, Ahmad ibn Ibrahim (1422 AH): "Al-Kashf wa al-Bayan 'an Tafsir al-Quran", Beirut: Dar Iḥya' al-Turath al-Arabi, 1st ed.
Hakim Hasakani, Ubaidullah ibn Abdullah (1369 SH): "Shawahid al-Tanzil li-Qawa'id al-Tafdeel fi al-Ayat al-Nazilah fi Ahl al-Bayt (AS)", Qom: Majma' Iḥya' al-Thaqafah al-Islamiyyah, 1st ed.
Howaizi, Abd Ali ibn Jum'ah (1415 AH): "Tafsir Nur al-Thaqalayn", Qom: Ismailian Publications, 4th ed.
Rashid Reza, Muhammad (n.d.): "Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim", Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah, 2nd ed.
Zarrin-Kolah, Elham (1396 SH): "Analysis of Contradictory Interpretative Narrations of Ibn Abbas Based on the Narrations of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) with Emphasis on Jami' al-Bayan and Nur al-Thaqalayn, PhD Thesis", Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
Rezaei Isfahani, Muhammad Ali and Reyhani Nia, Muhammad Ali (1398 SH): "Critique of the Entry "Ali ibn Abi Talib" in the Encyclopedia of the Yoreliman", Quranic Studies of Orientalists, 14(27), pp. 47-59.
Suyuti, Jalal al-Din (1404 AH): "Al-Durr al-Manthur fi Tafsir al-Ma'thur", Qom: Aytollah Mar'ashi Library.
Suyuti, Jalal al-Din (1421 AH): "Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran", Dar al-Kutub al-Arabi.
Tabatabai, Muhammad Hossein (1417 AH): "Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Quran", Qom: Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Teachers of the Hawzah, 14th ed.
Tabarsi, Fadl ibn Hasan (1372 SH): "Majma' al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran", Tehran: Nasir Khusraw Publications, 3rd ed.
Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir (1412 AH): "Jami' al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran", Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah, 1st ed.
Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hasan (n.d.): "Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir al-Quran", Beirut: Dar Iḥya' al-Turath al-Arabi.
Ayashi, Muhammad ibn Mas'ud (1380 SH): "Kitab al-Tafsir, edited by Hashem Rasouli Mahallati", Tehran: Alimiah Printing House.
Fakhr Razi, Muhammad ibn Umar (1420 AH): "Mafatih al-Ghayb", Beirut: Dar Iḥya' al-Turath al-Arabi, 3rd ed.
Qommi, Ali ibn Ibrahim (1367 SH): "Tafsir Qummi", Qom: Dar al-Kitab, 4th ed.
Kufi, Farat ibn Ibrahim (1410 AH): "Tafsir Farat al-Kufi", Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 1st ed.
Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir (1403 AH): "Bihar al-Anwar al-Jami'a li-Durar Akhbar al-A'immah al-Aṭhar", Beirut: Maktabat al-Wafa.
Mousavi Darebidi, Seyyed Hossein, Ahmadnejad, Amir (1401 SH): "A Comparative Study of the Approaches of Tafsir al-Tibyan and Majma' al-Bayan in Transmitting the Narrations of Ahl al-Bayt (AS)", Journal of Comparative Tafsir Studies, No. 15, pp. 337-364.
Mahdavi Rad, Muhammad Ali, Mosalaei, Abbas, Hamid Reza Fahimi Tabar (1388 SH): "Ijtihad in the Narrative Interpretation of Nur al-Thaqalayn", Journal of Hadith Studies, Year 1, No. 1, pp. 22-44.

  • Receive Date 20 November 2023
  • Revise Date 29 March 2024
  • Accept Date 08 April 2024
  • Publish Date 15 March 2025