Comparative Studies of Quran

Comparative Studies of Quran

A Comparative Analysis of Allamah Fadlallah and Ibn ‘Ashur on Qur’anic Verses Pertaining to Women

Document Type : Original

Authors
MARYAM GHOJAEI KHAMENE 1
saleh ghannadi 2
esmaeel gheragh 3
1 Level 4 graduate of Comparative Interpretation, Institute of Higher Education - Masoumieh Seminary, Qom, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. Qom, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Lecturer in Higher Levels of Interpretation, Specialized Center for Interpretation and Quranic Sciences. Qom Seminary, Qom, Iran
10.22034/csq.2025.487361.1488
Abstract
Detailed Abstract
Research objective:
The primary aim of this study is to identify, extract, and comparatively examine the foundational approaches of two prominent contemporary exegetes: Allamah Sayyid Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah (a Lebanese Shia scholar) and Sheikh Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn ‘Ashur (a Tunisian Maliki Sunni scholar) regarding Qur’anic verses on women’s issues.Given that women-related verses represent one of the most significant areas of interpretive divergence in the contemporary Islamic world, and that religious, cultural, social, and temporal factors deeply influence exegetical approaches, this study seeks to answer the central question: What are the strategic, cognitive, and practical foundations of these two scholars in addressing women-related Qur’anic verses (such as verses on Qiwamah, polygyny, inheritance, hijab, testimony, disciplinary measures, and similar issues), and what are the similarities and differences between them? Furthermore, to what extent are these similarities and differences shaped by their religious, cultural, and methodological presuppositions?
Methodology:
This study adopts a qualitative approach with a comparative-analytical method. In the first stage, Allamah Fadlallah’s Min Wahy al-Qur’an and Ibn ‘Ashur’s al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir, along with other relevant works by the two exegetes (such as Fadlallah’s Nathariyat al-Mar’ah fi al-Islam and Ibn ‘Ashur’s Maqasid al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah), were thoroughly examined and compared with respect to key Qur’anic verses concerning women.Subsequently, using content analysis, the foundational approaches of both exegetes were extracted, categorized, and juxtaposed. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective were evaluated with reference to the Qur’anic text and established principles of exegesis.
Findings:
The findings indicate that the foundations of the two exegetes regarding women’s issues can be categorized into three main areas:
1. Strategic Foundations: Both exegetes emphasize the necessity of reinterpreting women-related rulings according to the demands of time and place and consideration of the objectives of Shariah (Maqasid al-Shari‘ah). Ibn ‘Ashur explicitly articulates this principle as a theoretical framework under the title Maqasid al-Shari‘ah, whereas Allamah Fadlallah, without explicitly naming it, practically applies the same approach in his exegesis.
2. Cognitive Foundations: A significant commonality between the two scholars lies in the equality of men and women in humanity and inherent dignity and the importance of the family as the nucleus of society. However, serious differences emerge regarding the extent of women’s intellectual capacity, the scope of innate differences between men and women, and the nature and limits of Qiwamah. Ibn ‘Ashur affirms the general superiority of men in intellect and broad authority in Qiwamah, whereas Fadlallah considers this superiority limited, relative, and contingent upon specific circumstances.
3. Behavioral Foundations: In matters such as hijab, polygyny, disciplinary measures, and women’s social participation, both exegetes adopt a reformist and lenient approach compared to traditional interpretations. However, Allamah Fadlallah, due to his greater attention to the emotional and psychological characteristics of women, offers more audacious and women-centered perspectives.
The study also demonstrates that there exists a systematic cause-and-effect relationship among the various foundations of these two exegetes, allowing the compilation of a coherent “system of women’s issues in the Qur’an” derived from their combined insights.
Ultimately, this study demonstrates that despite religious differences (Shia and Sunni) and geographical and cultural variations, the foundational similarities between the two exegetes regarding women and related issues outweigh their differences. Both scholars have contributed to religious reform and the reinterpretation of women’s role within fiqh and exegesis.Ibn ‘Ashur’s views in certain areas (such as the intellectual superiority of men) and some of Allamah Fadlallah’s perspectives (such as his specific interpretation of disciplinary measures) remain open to critique and further detailed examination.This study, as a foundational comparative research, provides a basis for subsequent investigations into the detailed rulings and specific women-related issues in the exegesis of these two scholars. It can serve as a reliable resource for researchers in Qur’anic studies, Islamic women’s studies, comparative jurisprudence, and inter-sectarian studies. The findings are also valuable for policymakers in the fields of women and family, as well as for advocates of religious reform within the Islamic world.
Keywords
Allamah Fadlallah, Ibn &lsquo
Ashur, Qur&rsquo
anic Verses on Women, Qiwamah, Maqasid al-Shari&lsquo
ah, Islamic Reformist Thought, Comparative Studies of Women in the Qur&rsquo
an

Subjects

The Holy Qur’an
Ebrahimi, Sajjad (1390): "Fadlallah wa Sir-e Karna-ye Ma‘nawi-ye Ayat-e Qur’an", "Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Qur’ani", Nos. 65–66, pp. 248–271.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad Tahir (1985 AD): "Usul al-Nizam al-Ijtima‘i fi al-Islam", Tunis: Al-Sharikah al-Tunisiyyah lil-Tawzi‘, 2nd ed.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad Tahir (2001 AD): "Maqasid al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah", edited by: Muhammad al-Tahir al-Maysawi, Jordan: Dar al-Nafa’is.
Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad Tahir (1420 AH): "Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir Ibn ‘Ashur", Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Tarikh al-‘Arabi, 1st ed.
Ibn Manzur, Muhammad ibn Mukarram (1414 AH): "Lisan al-‘Arab", Beirut: Dar al-Fikr lil-Tiba‘ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi‘, Dar Sadir, 3rd ed.
Al-Azhari, Muhammad ibn Ahmad (n.d.): "Tahdhib al-Lughah", verified by: ‘Abd al-Salam, Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.
Ansari, Mas‘ud (1388): "Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir", "Nashriyyeh-ye Ettela‘at-e Hekmat wa Ma‘refat", Year 4, No. 3, pp. 27–30.
Anwari, Hasan; Akhiani, Jamileh (1381): "Farhang-e Bozorg-e Sokhan", Tehran: Sokhan.
Bustani, Fu’ad Afram (1375): "Farhang-e Abjadi-ye Alfba’i-ye ‘Arabi-Farsi (Tarjumah-ye Kamel al-Munjid al-Abjadi)", translated by: Reza Mahyar, Tehran: Salami.
Pakniya, Mahbubeh; Haji Vathuq, Neda; Tavakkoli Famou, Mohammad (1398): "Zan dar Manzumeh-ye Fikri-Ma‘rifi-ye Nowandishi-ye Dini", "Faslnameh-ye Motale‘at-e Siyasi", Year 12, No. 45, pp. 29–56.
Husayni, Muhammad Tahir (1437 AH): "Mutarahat fi Qadaya Qur’aniyyah", Beirut: Al-Markaz al-Islami al-Thaqafi.
Khorramshahi, Baha’ al-Din (1393): "Daneshnameh-ye Qur’an va Qur’an-pazhuhi", Tehran: Dostan; Nahid.
Dehkhoda, ‘Ali Akbar (1373): "Loghatnameh-ye Dehkhoda", Tehran: Mu’assasah-ye Loghatnameh va Daneshgah-e Tehran.
Dandash, Rahil (1437 AH): "Al-Mar’ah", Al-Markaz al-Islami al-Thaqafi, Beirut: Majma‘ al-Imamayn al-Hasanayn.
Subhani, Muhammad Taqi; Ziba’i Nejad, Muhammad Reza (1381): "Dar Amadi bar Nizam-e Shakhsiyat-e Zan dar Islam (Barrasi-ye Moqayesai-ye Didgah-e Islam va Gharb)", Qom: Daftar-e Motale‘at va Tahqiqat-e Zanan, Markaz-e Modiriyat-e Hoze-ye ‘Elmiyyeh Khaharan, 2nd ed.
Shabbar, Sa‘id (2007 AD): "Al-Ijtihad wa al-Tajdid fi al-Fikr al-Islami al-Mu‘asir", Herndon: Al-Ma‘had al-‘Alami lil-Fikr al-Islami, 1st ed.
Shafiei, ‘Ali (1387): "Rosh-shenasi-ye Tafsir dar Maghreb-e Islami", "Nashriyyeh-ye Pazhuhesh", No. 33, pp. 145–181.
Shokuri, Abu al-Fadl (1373): "Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir: Bozorgtarin Tafsir-e Maghreb-e Islami dar Sad-ha-ye Akhir", "Bayyinat", Year 1, No. 3, pp. 45–69.
Salahi Najafabadi, Na‘matullah (1387): "Hadith-ha-ye Khayali dar Majma‘ al-Bayan", Qom: Mu’assasah-ye Farhangi-ye Ettela‘-Resani-ye Tabyan.
‘Izzati Bakhshaish, Muhammad (1395): "Shakhes-ha va Vizhegi-ha-ye Tafsir ‘Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir’", "Faslnameh-ye Din va Donya-ye Mu‘asir", pp. 53–70.
‘Azimi, Muhammad Jawad (1370): "Goftogu ba Ostad Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah", "Ayeneh-ye Pazhuhesh", Year 2, No. 1, pp. 78–82.
‘Awda ‘Abd ‘Awda, ‘Abdullah; Samih ‘Abdullah Muhammad ‘Abd al-Hadi (2021 AD): "Al-Qadayaya al-Ijtima‘iyyah al-Muta‘allaqah bil-Mar’ah: Qira’ah fi Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir", "Madarat lil-‘Ulum al-Ijtima‘iyyah wa al-Insaniyyah, Tassadir ‘an al-Markaz al-Jami‘i Ghalizan – Al-Jaza’ir", No. 50, pp. 131–162.
Ghurawi Na’ini, Nahlah; Kardavani, Rahleh (1396): "Falsafeh-ye Tafavot-ha-ye Jensiyati az Manzar-e ‘Adl-e Ilahi", "Faslnameh-ye Takhasosi-ye Motale‘at-e Qur’an va Hadith-e Safineh", Year 14, No. 55, "Vizheh-ye ‘Adl-e Ilahi", pp. 12–37.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1383): "Donya-ye Zan", Tehran: Saharordi.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1417 AH): "Qira’ah al-Fiqh al-Jadidah li al-Mar’ah al-Huquqiyyah", Beirut: Dar al-Thaqalayn.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1419 AH): "Min Wahy al-Qur’an", Beirut: Dar al-Malak.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1998 AD): "Al-Nadwa", Beirut: Dar al-Malak, 4th ed.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1425 AH): "Tafakkurat Islamiyyah Hawla al-Mar’ah", Beirut: Dar al-Malak.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1421 AH): "Al-Insan wa al-Hayah", Beirut: Dar al-Malak.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1383): "Islam, Zan va Jostari-ye Tazeh", Qom: Bustan-e Ketab.
Fadlallah, Muhammad Husayn (1389): "Zan az Negahi Digar", translated by: Majid Moradi, Tehran: Sherkat-e Chap va Nashr-e Beyn al-Milal, 3rd ed.
Mashini, Farideh (Mordad 1387): "Darurat-e Tarh-e Zan va Nowandishi-ye Dini (Manzar-e Zananeh)", "Ayin", No. 15, pp. 42–46.
Moradi, Majid (1390): "Naqd va Barrasi-ye Ketab-e Dushvari-ha-ye Rosh-shenasi-ye Ijtihadi-ye Fahm-e Shari‘at dar Bazkhwani-ye Andisheh-ye ‘Allamah Sayyid Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah", "Ayeneh-ye Pazhuhesh", No. 132, pp. 41–54.
Mu‘in, Muhammad (1375): "Farhang-e Farsi", Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Miftah al-‘Ali, Haythamir (1994 AD): "Al-Shaykh Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn ‘Ashur wa Manhajuhu fi Tafsirih al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir", Doha: Dar al-Thaqafah.
Mehrizi, Mahdi (1387): "Nowandishi-ye Dini va Masa’lat-e Zan", "Ayin", No. 15, pp. 46–55.
Mehrizi, Mahdi (1384): "Roykard-ha-ye Madhhabi dar Tarikh-e Mu‘asir-e Iran ba Zan", "Majalleh-ye Ayeneh-ye Pazhuhesh", No. 91, pp. 7–26.
Al-Hilali, ‘Imad (1433 AH): "Al-Mar’ah Insan: Dirasah fi Insaniyyat al-Mar’ah ‘ind al-‘Allamah Fadlallah", "Al-Ijtihad wa al-Tajdid", Nos. 20–21, pp. 199–206.

  • Receive Date 06 November 2024
  • Revise Date 02 February 2025
  • Accept Date 05 February 2025
  • Publish Date 23 July 2025