Comparative Studies of Quran

Comparative Studies of Quran

An Analysis of the Fruits of Holding Fast to God within the Paradigms of Islamic Governance in Light of the Perspectives of Both Islamic Schools (Sunni and Shia)

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original

Authors
Mehdi Alizadeh 1
Eisa Eisazadeh 1
Elham Heydarpour 2
1 Faculty of the Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture
2 Level 4 student in the field of Tafsir, Rokn al-Hoda Specialized Seminary, Kerman
10.22034/csq.2025.543072.1580
Abstract
This study aims to elucidate the key concept of “holding fast to God” (iʿtiṣām bi-llāh) and its role as a practical strategy within the paradigms of Islamic governance. Despite the Qur’an’s repeated emphasis on this principle, its position within contemporary governance discourses has remained relatively overlooked. Employing a descriptive–analytical method and drawing on authentic Qur’anic, exegetical, and narrative sources, this research explores the dimensions and implications of this concept. The findings indicate a profound convergence between the two Islamic schools (Sunni and Shia) regarding both the necessity and the proper manner of adhering to God. Moreover, neglect of this divine strategy stems from factors such as lack of faith and knowledge of God, mistrust toward Him, obstinacy, excessive sensualism and rationalism, and reliance upon others. The most significant fruits of iʿtiṣām in the sphere of governance include the encompassing mercy of God, realization of beneficence (iḥsān), enjoyment of God’s constant companionship, protection from apostasy and deviation, and assurance of guidance toward the straight path. These outcomes elevate iʿtiṣām to a foundational principle ensuring stability and effectiveness within the Islamic political system.
Subjects
Comparative Studies of Quran

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 04 November 2025

  • Receive Date 24 August 2025
  • Revise Date 01 November 2025
  • Accept Date 04 November 2025
  • Publish Date 04 November 2025