Comparative Studies of Quran

Comparative Studies of Quran

A Comparative Study of Declarative Revelation in the Perspectives of Allameh Tabataba’i and Mahmoud Abu Rayyah

Document Type : review paper

Author
Assistant Professor Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
Detailed Abstract
Research Objective:
The aim of this article is to undertake a comparative study of non-Quranic revelation from the perspectives of Allameh Tabataba’i and Mahmoud Abu Rayyah. In Shia sources, this type of revelation is referred to as declarative revelation (waḥy bayānī), whereas in Sunni sources it is designated as the revelation of the Sunnah (waḥy al-sunnah) or unrecited revelation (waḥy ghayr matluww).
Research Methodology:
This article has been prepared on the basis of a descriptive-analytical method and through the use of library-based sources. In developing the discussion, both Shia and Sunni exegetical and hadith sources have been consulted. The earliest source to address this issue is al-Shafi‘i’s al-Risalah, a work that occupies an important position within the Sunni tradition.
Research Findings:
Allameh Tabataba’i, a contemporary exegete, in his commentary on «أَطِیعُوا اللَّهَ وَ أَطِیعُوا الرَّسُول» (al-Nisa’/59), maintains with regard to the source of the Noble Prophet’s knowledge that there is no doubt that, by commanding people to obey the Messenger, God intends nothing other than that they obey Him through what He has revealed to them by means of His Noble Messenger and that they put His teachings and laws into practice. At the same time, the Messenger of God possesses two dimensions: one is the station of legislation, and the other is the station of implementing rulings and exercising judgment. His discussion points to the descent of a form of non-Quranic revelation upon the Noble Prophet alongside Quranic revelation in the sphere of legislation, in a manner comparable to the content of the Arikah tradition, and reflects attention to the fact that God granted him the Quran as well as something like the Quran together with it.
Mahmoud Abu Rayyah, in Adwa’ ‘ala al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyyah, writes concerning non-Quranic revelation:
“It is necessary to refer here to a hadith in which it is reported that all hadiths [of the Noble Prophet] are of the nature of divine revelation to him, just like the Noble Quran. This tradition reads: «ألا و إنی أوتیت الکتاب و مثله معه», and in another narration it is stated: «ألا إنی أوتیت القرآن و مثله معه». This narration has been engulfed in a whirlpool of accusations. For when it is said that the Noble Prophet was given ‘something like the Book’ or ‘something like the Quran,’ this necessarily implies that such a thing was granted to him in order to complete the Quran or to perfect the exposition of his religion and law. Yet no command from the Noble Prophet has reached us concerning the writing down of this ‘something like the Quran’ during his lifetime, in the way that such instructions have come down to us regarding the writing of the Quran. Did he ever appoint scribes for it who were obliged to write it down at the time of its descent, just as he appointed scribes for the Quran? Is it reasonable to suppose that the Noble Prophet should have departed from this world while leaving behind half of what God had revealed to him—preserving one part while consigning the other to oblivion? Is it not the case that the Noble Prophet, through his knowledge, conveyed the message in the best possible manner and delivered the divine trust to those entitled to it…?” (Abu Rayyah, 1383 Sh., pp. 54–55)
In this passage, Abu Rayyah calls into question the claim that the Prophet received a binding form of non-Quranic revelation alongside the Quran. His principal objection is that, had such a revelation truly existed as a complement to the Quran or as a completion of the exposition of religion and law, there should have been explicit prophetic instructions for its writing and preservation comparable to those issued for the Quran.
Final Conclusion:
From the perspective of Shia and Sunni scholars, three principal sources have been proposed for the knowledge of the Noble Prophet. First, there is Quranic revelation, namely the revealed verses of the Noble Quran. Second, there is the Prophet’s ijtihad, which Allameh Tabataba’i presents under the heading of ṣawāb al-ra’y and associates with the domains of authority, governance, and adjudication. Third, there is non-Quranic revelation, which in Sunni scholarship is discussed under such designations as waḥy al-sunnah and waḥy ghayr matluww, and in Shia scholarship under the titles waḥy lays bi-Qur’an and waḥy bayānī.
Scholars of both schools have generally cited the Arikah tradition in discussions concerning the authoritative status of the Prophetic hadith in the legislation of religious rulings, the abrogation of the Book by the Sunnah, or in connection with relevant Quranic verses such as Qur’an 16:44, 75:19, and 20:114. On the basis of this tradition, they have maintained that two forms of revelation descended upon the Noble Prophet: the first, Quranic revelation, namely the verses of the Quran; and the second, non-Quranic revelation. Thus, the origin of the discussion of non-Quranic revelation with respect to the source of Prophetic knowledge is shared by scholars of both traditions.
Keywords
Subjects

The Holy Qur’an.
Ibn Athir, Mubarak bin Muhammad (1426 AH): “Al-Shafi fi Sharh Musnad al-Shafi’i”, Edited by Ahmad bin Sulayman & Abi Tamim Yasir bin Ibrahim, Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rashid.
Ibn Taymiyyah al-Harrani, Ahmad bin Abd al-Halim bin Abd al-Salam (1390 AH): “Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir”, Beirut: Dar Maktabat al-Hayat.
Ibn Hanbal, Ahmad (1412 AH): “Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal”, Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-'Arabi.
Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani, Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Ali (1369 Sh): “Mutashabih al-Qur’an wa Mukhtalifuhu”, Qom: Bidar.
Ibn Tawus, Ali bin Musa (n.d.): “Sa’d al-Su’ud lil-Nufus Mandud”, Qom: Dar al-Dhakha’ir.
Ibn Ashur, Muhammad Tahir (1420 AH): “Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir”, Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Tarikh al-'Arabi.
Ibn 'Atiyyah, Abd al-Haq bin Ghalib (1422 AH): “Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz”, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Qutaybah, Abd Allah bin Muslim (1406 AH): “Ta’wil Mukhtalif al-Hadith”, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr (1426 AH): “Al-Tibyan fi Aqsam al-Qur’an”, Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-'Asriyyah.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr (1411 AH): “I’lam al-Muwaqqi’in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin”, Edited by Muhammad Abd al-Salam Ibrahim, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Abu al-Futuh Razi, Husayn bin Ali (1408 AH): “Rawd al-Jinan wa Rawh al-Jinan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, Mashhad: Bunyad-e Pazhuhesh-haye Astan-e Quds-e Razavi.
Abu Rayyah, Mahmud (1383 Sh): “Adwa’ 'ala al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyyah”, 3rd edition, Qom: Mu’assasat Ansariyan.
Abi Dawud, Sulayman bin Ash’ath (1410 AH): “Sunan Abi Dawud”, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr lil-Tiba’ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi’.
Ahmadi Mianji, Ali (1419 AH): “Makatib al-Rasul (S)”, Qom: Dar al-Hadith.
Busti, Abu Sulayman Hamd bin Muhammad bin Ibrahim bin al-Khattab al-Ma’ruf bi al-Khattabi (2009 AD): “Ma’alim al-Sunan, wa huwa Sharh Sunan Abi Dawud”, Edited by Abd al-Salam Abd al-Shafi’i Muhammad, 4th edition, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Balaghi, Muhammad Jawad (1352 AH): “Ala’ al-Rahman fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, Qom: Wijdani.
Baha’ al-Din ‘Amili (Shaykh Baha’i), Muhammad bin Husayn (1383 Sh): “Zubdat al-Usul ma’ Hawashi al-Musannif 'alayha”, Edited by Jabbar Golbaghi Masuleh, Ali, Qom: Shari’at.
Panipati, Thana’ Allah (1412 AH): “Al-Tafsir al-Mazhari”, Quetta: Maktabat Rashidiyyah.
Javadi Amoli, Abd Allah (1384 Sh): “Nazahat-e Qur’an az Tahrif”, Edited by Ali Nasiri, 2nd edition, Qom: Markaz-e Nashr-e Isra.
Hurr 'Amili, Muhammad bin Hasan (1425 AH): “Ithbat al-Hudat bi al-Nusus wa al-Mu’jizat”, Beirut: A’lami.
Haqqi Bursawi, Isma’il bin Mustafa (n.d.): “Tafsir Ruh al-Bayan”, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Hilli, Jamal al-Din Hasan bin Yusuf (1425 AH): “Nihayat al-Wusul ila 'Ilm al-Usul”, Edited by Bahadori, Ibrahim, Qom: Mu’assasat al-Imam al-Sadiq (A).
Hilli, Jamal al-Din Hasan bin Yusuf (1380 Sh): “Tahthib al-Wusul ila 'Ilm al-Usul”, Edited by Razawi Kashmiri, Muhammad Husayn bin Ali Naqi, London: Mu’assasat al-Imam Ali (A).
Khazin, Ali bin Muhammad (1415 AH): “Lubab al-Nuqul fi Ma’ani al-Tanzil (Tafsir al-Khazin)”, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Manshurat Muhammad 'Ali Baydun.
Khu’i, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim (1430 AH): “Al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, Qom: Mu’assasat Ihya’ Athar al-Imam al-Khu’i.
Darwazah, Muhammad 'Izzah (1421 AH): “Tafsir al-Hadith”, 2nd edition, Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.
Subhani, Ja’far (1419 AH): “Al-'Aqidah al-Islamiyyah ‘ala Daw’ Madrasat Ahl al-Bayt (A)”, Qom: Mu’assasat al-Imam al-Sadiq (A).
Subhani, Ja’far (1387 Sh): “Tadhkirat al-A’yan”, Qom: Mu’assasat al-Imam al-Sadiq (A).
Surabadi, Abu Bakr 'Atiq bin Muhammad (1380 Sh): “Tafsir-e Surabadi”, Tehran: Farhang-e Nashr-e Now.
Sharif al-Murtada, Ali bin al-Husayn (Sayyid al-Murtada) (1426 AH): “Al-Amali”, Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim, Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-'Asriyyah.
Sharif al-Murtada, Ali bin al-Husayn (Sayyid al-Murtada) (1376 Sh): “Al-Dhari’ah ila Usul al-Shari’ah”, Edited by Abu al-Qasim Gorji, Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Sharif al-Murtada, Ali bin al-Husayn (Sayyid al-Murtada) (1413 AH): “Tafsir al-Sharif al-Murtada”, Beirut: Mu’assasat al-A’lami lil-Matbu’at.
Shawkani, Muhammad bin Ali bin Muhammad (1414 AH): “Fath al-Qadir”, Damascus-Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir, Dar al-Kalim al-Tayyib.
Sadr al-Muta’allihin, Muhammad bin Ibrahim (1366 Sh): “Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim”, 2nd edition, Qom: Entesharat-e Bidar.
Saduq, Muhammad bin Ali (1371 Sh): “Al-I’tiqadat al-Imamiyyah”, Translated by Sayyid Muhammad Ali Hasani, Tehran: Islamiyyah.
Tabataba’i, Sayyid Muhammad Husayn (1390 AH): “Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, 2nd edition, Beirut: Mu’assasat al-A’lami lil-Matbu’at.
Tabarsi, Fadl bin Hasan (1370 Sh): “Majma’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, 3rd edition, Tehran: Entesharat-e Naser Khosrow.
Tantawi, Muhammad Sayyid (1997 AD): “Al-Tafsir al-Wasit lil-Qur’an al-Karim”, Cairo: Nahdat Misr.
Tusi, Muhammad bin Hasan (n.d.): “Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an”, Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-'Arabi.
Tusi, Muhammad bin Hasan (1417 AH): “Al-'Uddah fi Usul al-Fiqh”, Qom: Setareh.
'Askari, Sayyid Murtada (1415 AH): “Al-Qur’an al-Karim wa Riwayat al-Madrasatayn”, Beirut: Sharikat al-Tawhid lil-Nashr.
Qasimi, Jamal al-Din (1418 AH): “Mahasin al-Ta’wil”, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Manshurat Muhammad 'Ali Baydun.
Qurtubi, Muhammad bin Ahmad (1363 Sh): “Al-Jami’ li-Ahkam al-Qur’an”, Tehran: Naser Khosrow.
Kasani al-Hanafi, ‘Ala’ al-Din Abu Bakr bin Mas’ud bin Ahmad (1406 AH): “Bada’i’ al-Sana’i’ fi Tartib al-Shara’i’”, 2nd edition, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir bin Muhammad Taqi (1403 AH): “Bihar al-Anwar al-Jami’ah li-Durar Akhbar al-A’immah al-Athar”, 2nd edition, Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-'Arabi.
Maraghi, Ahmad Mustafa (n.d.): “Tafsir al-Maraghi”, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Mufid, Muhammad bin Muhammad bin al-Nu’man (1413 AH): “Awa’il al-Maqalat”, Qom: Entesharat-e Kongere-ye Jahani-ye Shaykh Mufid.
Muqaddas Ardabili, Ahmad bin Muhammad (n.d.): “Zubdat al-Bayan fi Ahkam al-Qur’an”, Edited by Muhammad Baqir Behbudi, Tehran: Maktabat al-Murtadawiyyah.
Mahdavi Rad, Muhammad Ali (1382 Sh): “Afaq-e Tafsir”, Tehran: Hasti-Nama.
Mahdavi Rad, Muhammad Ali (1388 Sh): “Tadwin al-Hadith”, Tehran: Hasti-Nama.
Maybudi, Rashid al-Din Ahmad bin Abi Sa’d (1371 Sh): “Kashf al-Asrar wa 'Uddat al-Abrar”, 5th edition, Tehran: Entesharat-e Amir Kabir.
Mir Damad, Muhammad Baqir bin Muhammad (1311 AH): “Al-Rawashih al-Samawiyyah fi Sharh al-Ahadith al-Imamiyyah”, Qom: Dar al-Khilafah.
Najmi, Muhammad Sadiq (1385 Sh): “Adwa’ 'ala al-Sahihayn”, 2nd edition, Qom: Bonyad-e Ma’aref-e Islami.
Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
January 2026
Pages 188-213

  • Receive Date 07 February 2025
  • Revise Date 25 April 2025
  • Accept Date 24 July 2026
  • Publish Date 22 December 2025